The Coordinated Trumpian-US and Israeli, Respective, Naval and Air Force Aerial Bombing Attacks on Iran Is Another Attempt by Them at Terrorizing an Unconditional Surrender Regime Change of Iran's Government Leadership to a New Leadership, Including of Its Armed Forces and Police Forces, that Would be Acceptable to Them and that They Would Control, in the Interest of Israel

The Coordinated Trumpian-US and Israeli, Respective, Naval and Air Force Aerial Bombing Attacks on Iran Is Another Attempt by Them at Terrorizing an Unconditional Surrender Regime Change of Iran's Government Leadership to a New Leadership, Including of Its Armed Forces and Police Forces, that Would be Acceptable to Them and that They Would Control, in the Interest of Israel, with Trump Being the Benefactor and Israel the Beneficiary

The Iranian military has a robust hi-tech electronic GPS drone-warfare capability and shared it with Russia, which is using it massively almost every day against Ukraine, which has it own, too, its own system for manufacturing warfare drones, said to be the best in Europe and that produces warfare drones as good as those of the USA, which the Russians, from their captures of Ukraine’s drones, study to upgrade their now own drone-warfare manufacturing technology, which they probably share with Iran (previously Russia's main supplier of warfare drones), the PRC (China) and North Korea, Russia’s steady friends. Iran’s standing military can be expected to ongoingly upgrade and use its ballistic-missile and drone warfare capability and endure and reply to, over the very long term, its now mutual aerial ballistic warfare with and against Israel and the US naval armada and the USA's small and vulnerable military bases in neighboring nations, some of whose regimes and most of whose populations view both as genocidal imperialist hegemonic land and natural resources grabbers and parasitical moneygrubber crusaders and economic colonists, imperial Zionists and their big-brother backer, gladiator and collaborator the USA government and its armed forces (Dare I say: Capisci, each Venezuela, Canada, Panama, West Bank and Gaza Palestine, Greenland and Denmark, European NATO and Western Europe? Trump's claim of the USA's national security need for other peoples' property and disciplining and controlling other nations is the mask and rationale for his representing ulterior, private, economic colonial priority interests, internal and external to the USA.). Iran has already proven that it can engage in intense and grueling decades-length war and defeat a military invasion and occupation, more so than Iraq, Afghanistan and Syria, all of which did, at great cost to themselves. Likely, Iran will get all variety of long-term support in its war from the Central Asia '‘-stan” nations of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, among others thereabouts. It already looks like Iran has targeted with aerial missile-launch and drone bombing attacks, and will attempt to destroy them, all US military bases in the entire region, as its first main-focus priority. Its combat drones might now be outfitted with cameras, a feature Russia innovated for and has on its drones for its military personnel to witness unquestionably where they strike and their destructive impacts, and may deploy high-speed marine-drone anti-ship mines, along with aerial bombing and combination bombing-and-bullet drones, against the nearby US armada (Ukraine has done something akin to this successfully on occasion to Russian warships) and resort, like Afghanistan resistance forces successfully did against the air force of the one-time Soviet Union occupation forces of their nation and like Ukraine successfully did to Russian fighter jets, largely rendering them a Russian liability, early in the Russian armed forces invasion of Ukraine, to attacking raids of expensive Israeli and US fighter-jet bombers in its air space with cheap portable, shoulder-mounted, but contemporary, anti-aircraft guided-surface-to-air [launch] missile systems, as well as combat-unit mobile, multi-launch anti-aircraft systems, perhaps as day-and-night capable camera-sensor-triggered attack drones, to rid them and the advisability of their use in the skies of and against Iran by Israel and the USA, https://youtu.be/JSl9E3Q42ko?si=DBXAhjD0qkwFICLT, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Man-portable_air-defense_system. Trump’s top generals and admirals cautioned him against this offensive military adventure (unconstitutional act of war), but expect that he will blame them and fire some of them, as his scapegoat fall guys, for its, being his, military misadventure if and when it goes awry.

Also, check out the click-on-to-view photos of portable, mini shoulder-mount anti-aircraft surface-to-air missile and combat-unit mobile, multi-missile anti-aircraft systems:

Photos of shoulder-mounted anti-aircraft surface-to-air missile systems https://www.google.com/search?q=Photos+of+shoulder-mounted+anti-aircraft+surface-to-air+missile+systems&sca_esv=37a6bd0bd2466e07&biw=1366&bih=638&ei=-L6lad3ZGISp0PEP_ejCqQw&ved=0ahUKEwjdteep1YGTAxWEFDQIHX20MMUQ4dUDCBE&uact=5&oq=Photos+of+shoulder-mounted+anti-aircraft+surface-to-air+missile+systems&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiR1Bob3RvcyBvZiBzaG91bGRlci1tb3VudGVkIGFudGktYWlyY3JhZnQgc3VyZmFjZS10by1haXIgbWlzc2lsZSBzeXN0ZW1zSISMA1CvV1iEqAJwAXgAkAEAmAGAAaAB6RmqAQUxNi4xOLgBA8gBAPgBAZgCF6ACxBTCAggQABiwAxjvBcICCxAAGIAEGLADGKIEwgILEAAYsAMYogQYiQXCAgUQABjvBcICCBAAGIAEGKIEwgIIEAAYogQYiQXCAggQIRigARjDBMICChAhGKABGMMEGAqYAwCIBgGQBgOSBwQzLjIwoAeCZLIHBDIuMjC4B6wUwgcGMi0xNy42yAeiAYAIAA&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

Photos of combat-unit mobile multi-launch surface-to-air anti-aircraft missile systems https://www.google.com/search?q=Photos+of+anti-aircraft+missile+systems&sca_esv=37a6bd0bd2466e07&biw=1366&bih=638&ei=2b6laapQhrDQ8Q__roqoAw&ved=0ahUKEwjqoOua1YGTAxUGGDQIHX-XAjUQ4dUDCBE&uact=5&oq=Photos+of+anti-aircraft+missile+systems&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LXNlcnAiJ1Bob3RvcyBvZiBhbnRpLWFpcmNyYWZ0IG1pc3NpbGUgc3lzdGVtczIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigATIFECEYqwIyBRAhGKsCMgUQIRirAkj1zgFQ-wpYsogBcAN4AZABAJgBsAGgAbkKqgEDMi45uAEDyAEA-AEBmAINoAKOC8ICChAAGLADGNYEGEfCAgYQABgHGB7CAgYQABgNGB7CAggQABgFGA0YHsICBRAAGO8FwgIIEAAYgAQYogTCAgoQIRigARjDBBgKwgIIECEYoAEYwwSYAwCIBgGQBgiSBwM0LjmgB8UnsgcDMS45uAfaCsIHBzItOC40LjHIB3eACAA&sclient=gws-wiz-serp

Trump Frenzy and Tantrums Over Pending Ruling on Birthright Citizenship and Recent Ruling on Presidential Tariffs by the US Supreme Court

 

Trump Frenzy and Tantrums Over Pending Ruling on Birthright Citizenship and Recent Ruling on Presidential Tariffs by the US Supreme Court

Trump rails against birthright citizenship in rambling Truth Social post and warns Supreme Court about keeping it https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-rails-against-birthright-citizenship-123638438.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw&tsrc=twtr via u/YahooNews

He is Mr. Babyman Stupid spouting off his ignoramus mouth about loyalty to the [US] Constitution while evidencing hardly a clue as to what it says. As to birthright citizenship, tell that windbag idiot and his stooped-over, sloth-footed and lumbering hippo-in-a-suit and insult-contriving smack-attack cliche-snorting-and-grunting communications director, and their MAGA airhead echo-chamber mob chorus of White House anti-Constitutional mobsters, to read what the text, the stated written law, of the supreme law of the supreme US Constitution prescribes to constitute US citizenship:

AMENDMENT XIV
Passed by Congress June 13, 1866. Ratified July 9, 1868.

Note: Article I, section 2, of the Constitution was modified by section 2 of the 14th amendment.

Section 1.
"All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."

On this matter of US citizenship, the supreme US Constitution, in its hereinabove quoted supreme constitutional law, prescribes unambiguously and clearly in the language of its own text as to what constitutes US citizenship. It speaks for itself definitively and with finality, and is not subject to outside re-interpretation, glib, gaslighting, sophistry, chicanery, etc., and overlay tampering in or by the federal or any other US courts or political or governance bodies. It is textual standing supreme US Constitutional law that the justices of the US Supreme Court are duty bound to adhere to, uphold, re-state and reaffirm in their judicial ruling as to what the law is as to what constitutes qualified US citizenship according to the language of the US Constitution and determine who or what is in violation or conflict with the said US Constitutional law, and are duty bound to order and enforce compliance with that US Constitutional law. Neither the judicial system, including its Supreme Court, nor the president of the USA has any US Constitutional legislative and law-making authority, powers, which, instead, the US Constitution confers exclusively on the US Congress, https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/constitution.htm#a1, whose federal statutory laws in the USA are subordinate only the US Constitution and its laws. However, the US Congress cannot lawfully, that is, Constitutionally lawfully, change US Constitutional law except by the [arduous] amendment process of the US Constitution prescribed by and in the US Constitution.

Likewise, the US Supreme Court was US Constitutionally duty bound to rule, as it did in its 6-to-3 judicial ruling among its 9 justices (which should have been 9 to 0, to have been 100%, unanimous, in adherence and fealty to the US Constitution), that the US president had no sovereign authority, independently of or autonomously from the US Congress or the US Constitution, to levy tariffs, a taxation and levying authority (subsuming and including all charges and fees) on any or all [US Congressionally or Constitutionally referenced] designation of goods, services, etc., or equitable per-capita measure of persons, such as for the purpose of allocating federal funds...) as well as all legislative authority, both authorities of which are conferred exclusively to the US Congress in Article I of the US Constitution, https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-rejects-trumps-global-tariffs-2026-02-20/. The Supreme Court determined that President Trump neither in the historical context of its applicable use by past presidents granted the same authority by the same legislative act of the US Congress, nor in his use of that US Congressional act, wrongfully to impose tariffs, acted in accord with the language prescribing the intended use of the act by a president lawfully as regards the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/STATUTE-91/pdf/STATUTE-91-Pg1625.pdf, which authorizes the president to seize assets, block [financial] transactions and to prosecute offenders for sentences of 20 years of imprisonment and substantial fines during a national emergency, such as in providing or receiving financial support connected to international terrorism, rampant organized crime, guerilla war, subversion and insurrection, riots, etc., a federal statuary law that makes no reference to or provision for the incumbent president to impose tariffs or taxes of any kind nor of the president being granted the right to do so, to independently impose tariffs in emergencies. President Trump has been referencing the IEEPA as his legal source of authority for imposing tariffs based on his argument that the net trade deficit of the USA with other nations is a national emergency and that he has the authority under IEEPA to arrogate the exclusive US Constitutional authority and power of the US Congress to impose tariffs on his own initiative as an economic tool of his as US president to engineer the balance of trade between the USA and each of the other nations of the world, universally, in favor of the USA, America first. Moreover, one justice factually and crucially, from a legality standpoint, pointed out, in effect, that the US Congress, nevertheless, did not have the right to delegate its exclusive US Constitutional power to tax and impose tariffs, without changing the US Constitution through the amendment process of the US Constitution to delegate or share it with the president, with the terms of the sharing still needing therein to be clearly stated, delineated and circumscribed, as to under what circumstances and generally for how long, the emergency power of the president to impose tariffs, tariff taxes (import or export taxes, as distinct from income, sales or consumption, etc., taxes), would apply. The underlying message of this ruling by the Supreme Court was that if the president lawfully, US Constitutionally so, wants to impose tariffs that he can go to the US Congress and request that it pass legislation to impose them.

Failed US DOJ's Attempted Grand Jury Indictment of Constitutionally Lawful 1st Amendment Conscientious Freedom of Speech of Congressmembers on Frivolous Legal Grounds as Seditious Conspiracy Speech, aka Treason

Failed US DOJ's Attempted Grand Jury Indictment of Constitutionally Lawful 1st Amendment Conscientious Freedom of Speech of Congressmembers on Frivolous Legal Grounds as Seditious Conspiracy Speech, aka Treason

Click on the following hyperlink to read the news article:

https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/democrats-want-turn-tables-pirro-161648527.html

Also click below to read a news on a federal judge's ruling that US DOD Secretary Hegseth violated US Senator Mark Kelly's same right by attempting to punish it: https://www.newser.com/story/383643/judge-blocks-hegseth-from-punishing-sen-kelly.html

 

 

Writer's Commentary

 

The Trump administration's objective in bringing sham criminal charges against members of the US Congress, before a federal grand jury for its indictment of them for seditious conspiracy, aka treason, for their exercise of their US Constitutional right of not only free speech but of conscientious free speech was for the Trump administration to attempt to establish by means of the federal legal process that free speech is treasonous when it is criticism of the US President (Trump), when it says that the President is speaking or acting unlawfully when he is speaking and/or acting in violation of the US Constitution or US Congressional federal statutory law, when it says that the members of the armed forces should not (,moreover, that they must not,) obey [or comply with and execute] illegal orders issued to them by the US President or any others in the armed-forces chain of command, "a thou shalt not" armed-forces institutional commandment which is already part of their formal boot-camp or basic-training and continuing armed-forces US Uniform Code of Military Justice code-of-conduct training, and when it says that they, as US armed forces and federal personnel, swear or pledge an oath of allegiance only to the US Constitution, and to defend, protect and uphold it, which in its manifestation and embodiment is the Constitutional Bill-of-Rights Republic system of government and national ethos and society, and its and their integrity, of the United States of America.  

 

The hope of the Trump presidency's thus attempted spurious litigation and prosecution is or was, as well as that of its comparable legal system attempts are, to use Trump-for-Fuhrer and MAGA-GOP-First politically partisan and civically ignorant people of legal impact of the federal legal processes and judiciary to render pseudo-legal verdicts or judicial rulings contradictory to and in violation of the supreme-law US Constitution, as well as, in violation of, subordinate only to the US Constitution, US Congressional federal statutory law, that legally pretend, and fraudulently purvey the legalistic illusion, in mass public perception and belief, that the US President is above, exempt from and not subject to US Constitutional law (which creates the office and powers of the US president and other branches and positions of the top governance officials of the US federal government) and US Congressional federal statutory law, and that, falsely, the US President (Trump) and his powers supersede them and all law, and that, therefore, his illegal acts and orders are not really illegal but are always legal, albeit when they are in violation of the US Constitution and US Congressional statutory law, as well as that the status of their legality must not be questioned and challenged, and that to question and challenge the legality of and possible wrongful compliance with his actions and orders is treasonous speech and treason against the United States of America, punishable by death, as though he singularly summarily constitutes and represents the totality of the bodies of law and the system and institutions of the US government and governance of the USA.

[Constitution of the United States, https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/constitution.htm

Article 1 (Characterization, powers and governance jurisdiction of the US Congress stated in the US Constitution)
Section 1   Section 2   Section 3   Section 4   Section 5   Section 6   Section 7   
Section 8   Section 9   Section 10

Section 1 (The US Congress)

"All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives." ....

Section 7

All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills. ....

Section 8

The Congress shall have Power

To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States; To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes; To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States; To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures; To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States; ....;

[The US Constitutional Authorities of the US Congress Over the US Armed Forces and Sole Power to Authorize Acts of War and Declare War, Antecedent and In Addition to Its Subsequent Federal Statutory Law Authorities Over New Branches of the Armed Forces]

*****To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations; To declare War, grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water; To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

*****To provide and maintain a Navy;

*****To "make Rules" for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces; To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions; (So, the US Congress and members of the US Congress do have the right and authority to speak out and advise members of the US Armed Forces to refuse to obey and carry out an illegal order, also consistent with US Uniform Code of Military Justice, issued by any superior in the armed forces' chain of command, including by the secretary of the Department of Defense and/or the US president or vice president, and the US president is subordinate and subject to its rules of governance of the armed forces.)

*****To provide for organizing, arming, "and disciplining, the Militia," "and for 'governing' such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States," reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, "and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;" (So, again, the US president, even as the US Constitutional commander in chief of the US Armed Forces is, nevertheless, US Constitutionally subordinate and subject to the US Constitutional authority of the US Congress as regards its oversight, regulation, use and legal governance of the US Armed Forces.)

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;—And

"To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof." (Thus, as the US Constitution explicitly confers all legislative and law-making authority for the USA and its government and governance exclusively on the US Congress, the US president cannot have and has no law-making authority and his or her executive orders (which are policy directives or commands to executive branch personnel for their implementation of them as operational practices or action/s) and military orders (likewise) that pose as law are unlawful, invalid and null and void as well as are subject to adjudication as fraud in a trial when they have or could have adverse consequences. They must comply with both the US Constitution and its law and US Congressional statutory law in order for them to be lawful and valid. If there is a conflict between these two bodies of law, then the presidential executive orders or military orders must comply foremost with the supreme US Constitution and its law, to which all federal government officials, including members of the US Congress and president and vice president, and personnel swear an oath of allegiance to preserve, uphold and defend or one to such an effect.)

Incidentally, the US Congress has additional powers stated in Article III, which is applicable to the federal judiciary, of the US Constitution.

Section 3

The US Supreme Court ruling that a US president cannot be prosecuted for illegalities or crimes that he or she commits, or may commit, in the course of his/her executing his/her official duties is a wrongful judicial ruling as it contradicts the text of the US Constitution itself and so is subject to review and a trial of impeachment and vacating of that ruling itself by an independent prosecutor, and team, and all-states, interstate-state, collective constitutional-review supreme court, composed of a lottery-chosen justice from each of the state supreme courts, commissioned and convened by the US Congress, or its Senate, for impeachment trying of the wrongful SCOTUS ruling violating the text of the US Constitution, in that provision 7 of section 3 of article 1 of the US Constitution in verbatim states:

Section 3: "The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present. 'Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law'" -- for treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors. This prescription, and its language, of the US Constitution makes clear that all government officials, including the US president, are subject to the laws of the United States of America.]

 

 

(Quote

 

US Sen. Elissa Slotkin

 

 

@SenatorSlotkin·02-11-2026

 

(When the President threatens you and it results in threats to your family. That is enough to keep a lot of people quiet. That's the point. The intimidation is the point. So others watch and say, "That's not for me." But yesterday, a Grand Jury of anonymous citizens pushed back.))

__________________________________________________________

Shift of focus to some Valentine’s Day extended weekend complimentary music for your hoped-for enjoyment. Check it out:

Heart, Heart - Heart of Gold: Solo performed by Felton Pilate and duet by Felton Pilate and Gail Mauldrew. Two oldies presented in celebration of this Valentine’s Day and extended holiday weekend 

(Glitch-free and click-on link now working) 

Click on the following link to hear the two love songs:

https://open.substack.com/pub/aofl/p/heart-heart-heart-of-gold-solo-performed-2b0?utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=web

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Trump Offshoring the Money from the Sale of the Oil Cargo on Board the Venezuelan Oil Tankers Seized, at His Command, by the US Navy

Click-on-to-view news articles are highlighted or underlined

Trump Offshoring the Money from the Sale of the Oil Cargo on Board the Venezuelan Oil Tankers Seized, at His Command, by the US Navy

"Trump Is Reportedly Funneling Money From Venezuelan Oil Sales To a Bank Account in Qatar https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-reportedly-funneling-money-venezuelan-041430420.html?soc_src=social-sh&soc_trk=tw&tsrc=twtr via u/YahooNews"

Trump is using the US federal government and his official office of service in it as US president and commander in chief of the US armed forces and using the US military itself, unconstitutionally, without the constitutionally required prior knowledge, consent and vote of approval of fully both houses of the US Congress (to which the US Constitution assigns the sole authority to authorize and declare war, including acts of war), on his own initiative in unconstitutionally organizing and ordering a US military operation and deadly attack on Venezuela and seizing its leader and declaring his seizure and ownership of its national oil resources as well as reportedly naming himself the interim new head of state of Venezuela, in brazen violation, disregard and defiance, and so far, with impunity, of the US Constitution and US Uniform Code of Military Justice (to which both Trump as commander in chief of the US armed forces and Hegseth as secretary of the US Department of Defense, newly alternatively named the US Department of War, in thereby being members of the US armed forces, are also subject and accountable), and federal and international law and law-enforcement. He is now furthermore undertaking unconstitutionally to sequester this seized foreign economic resource from the constitutional control and disposition of the US Congress, in which the US Constitution assigns all fiscal, revenue, budgetary, monetary, commerce and economic (treasury) authority to the US Congress, although the executive branch department and agency administrators of these functions are appointed by the US president, but with the advice and consent vote of approval of the US Senate, and he is funneling its income offshore so as to bypass US constitutionally required control of it by the US Congress and implicitly create with it an extra-constitutional, independent treasury income, budgetary and funding resource and asset for the Trump US presidency that is wholly and discretionarily controlled by Trump as the US president. So far, the Venezuela oil-sourced money coming to the Trump US presidency has been coming from the Trump administration's piracy sale of the oil cargo on board the at-sea Venezuelan oil tankers piracy-seized at the command of the Trump administration by the US Navy or Coast Guard, seizures and sales not authorized by the US Congress, https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/trump-hands-first-sale-swiped-150105918.html .

Legal References

Constitution of the United States, https://www.senate.gov/about/origins-foundations/senate-and-constitution/constitution.htm

Preamble   Article I   Article II   Article III                      Article IV   Article V   Article VI   
Article VII AMENDMENTS

Article I

Section 1   Section 2   Section 3   Section 4                Section 5   Section 6   Section 7   
Section 8   Section 9   Section 10 

Section 1 (Characterization, powers and governance jurisdiction of the US Congress stated in the US Constitution)

All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representative.

Section 7

All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States: If he approve he shall sign it, but if not he shall return it, with his Objections to that House in which it shall have originated, who shall enter the Objections at large on their Journal, and proceed to reconsider it. If after such Reconsideration two thirds of that House shall agree to pass the Bill, it shall be sent, together with the Objections, to the other House, by which it shall likewise be reconsidered, and if approved by two thirds of that House, it shall become a Law. But in all such Cases the Votes of both Houses shall be determined by Yeas and Nays, and the Names of the Persons voting for and against the Bill shall be entered on the Journal of each House respectively. If any Bill shall not be returned by the President within ten Days (Sundays excepted) after it shall have been presented to him, the Same shall be a Law, in like Manner as if he had signed it, unless the Congress by their Adjournment prevent its Return, in which Case it shall not be a Law.

Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States; and before the Same shall take Effect, shall be approved by him, or being disapproved by him, shall be repassed by two thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the Rules and Limitations prescribed in the Case of a Bill.

Section 8

The Congress shall have Power

To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;

To borrow Money on the credit of the United States;

To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;

To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;

To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures;

To provide for the Punishment of counterfeiting the Securities and current Coin of the United States;

To establish Post Offices and post Roads;

To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;

To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;

[The US Constitutional Authorities of the US Congress Over the US Armed Forces and Sole Power to Authorize Acts of War and Declare War, Antecedent and In Addition to Its Subsequent Federal Statutory Law Authorities Over New Branches of the Armed Forces]

*****To "define and punish" Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations;

*****To "declare War," grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and "make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water;"

*****To raise and support Armies, but no Appropriation of Money to that Use shall be for a longer Term than two Years;

*****To provide and maintain a Navy;

*****To make Rules for the Government and Regulation of the land and naval Forces; (So, the US Congress and members of the US Congress do have the right and authority to speak out and advise members of the US Armed Forces to refuse to obey and carry out an illegal order, also consistent with US Uniform Code of Military Justice, issued by any superior in the armed forces' chain of command, including by the secretary of the Department of Defense/War and/or the US president or vice president, and the US president is subordinate and subject to its rules of governance of the armed forces.)

*****To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions;

*****To provide for organizing, arming, and "disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States," reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress; (So, again, the US president, even as the US Constitutional commander in chief of the US Armed Forces is, nevertheless, US Constitutionally subordinate and subject to the US Constitutional authority of the US Congress as regards its oversight, regulation, use and legal governance of the US Armed Forces.)

To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, dock-Yards, and other needful Buildings;—And

"To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof." (Thus, as the US Constitution explicitly confers all legislative and law-making authority for the USA and its government and governance exclusively on the US Congress, the US president cannot have and has no law-making authority and his or her executive orders (which are policy directives or commands to executive branch personnel for their implementation of them as operational practices or action/s) and military orders (likewise) that pose as law are unlawful, invalid and null and void as well as are subject to adjudication as fraud in a trial when they have or could have adverse consequences. They must comply with both the US Constitution and its law and US Congressional statutory law in order for them to be lawful and valid. If there is a conflict between these two bodies of law, then the presidential executive orders or military orders must comply foremost with the supreme US Constitution and its law, to which all federal government officials, including members of the US Congress and president and vice president, and personnel swear an oath of allegiance to preserve, uphold and defend or one to such an effect.)

Incidentally, the US Congress has additional powers stated in Article III, which is applicable to the federal judiciary, of the US Constitution.

Section 9

The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.

The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.

No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed.

No Capitation, or other direct, Tax shall be laid, unless in Proportion to the Census or enumeration herein before directed to be taken.

No Tax or Duty shall be laid on Articles exported from any State.

No Preference shall be given by any Regulation of Commerce or Revenue to the Ports of one State over those of another; nor shall Vessels bound to, or from, one State, be obliged to enter, clear, or pay Duties in another.

No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

Section 10

No State shall enter into any Treaty, Alliance, or Confederation; grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal; coin Money; emit Bills of Credit; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debts; pass any Bill of Attainder, ex post facto Law, or Law impairing the Obligation of Contracts, or grant any Title of Nobility.

Section 3

The US Supreme Court ruling that a US president cannot be prosecuted for illegalities or crimes that he or she commits, or may commit, in the course of his/her executing his/her official duties is a wrongful judicial ruling as it contradicts the text of the US Constitution itself and so is subject to review and a trial of impeachment and vacating of that ruling itself by an independent prosecutor, and team, and all-states, interstate-state, collective constitutional-review supreme court, composed of a lottery-chosen justice from each of the state supreme courts, commissioned and convened by the US Congress for impeachment trying of the wrongful SCOTUS judicial ruling violating the text of the US Constitution, in that provision 7 of section 3 of article 1 of the US Constitution in verbatim states:

Section 3: "The Senate shall have the sole Power to try all Impeachments. When sitting for that Purpose, they shall be on Oath or Affirmation. When the President of the United States is tried, the Chief Justice shall preside: And no Person shall be convicted without the Concurrence of two thirds of the Members present. 'Judgment in Cases of Impeachment shall not extend further than to removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of honor, Trust or Profit under the United States: but the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law'" -- for treason, bribery, or other high crimes or misdemeanors. This prescription, and its language, of the US Constitution makes clear that all government officials, including the US president, are subject to the laws of the United States of America.

Moreover,

Article II (Characterization, powers and governance jurisdiction of the US president as stated in the US Constitution -- relevant excerpts)

Section 1   Section 2   Section 3   Section 4

Section 1

The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows:

Section 4

"The President, Vice President and all Civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors."

These akin prescriptions, and their language, of the US Constitution make clear that all government officials, including the US president, are subject to the laws of the United States of America.

To pointedly reiterate, the augmented language of Provision 7 of Section 3 of Article 1 to the language of akin Section 4 of Article II of the US Constitution explicitly states that "...but the Party convicted (the government official impeached for treason, bribery, or high crimes or misdemeanors) shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law" -- federal law, and, as applicable, state/wide or within a state constitutional and statutory law.

Furthermore, after the impeachment trial and the vacating of the wrongful SCOTUS ruling, the US Congress should pass a 2/3rds or larger majority-vote act in both of its houses law stating explicitly that all persons in the United States of America as well as those subject to its jurisdiction are fully subject to all of the laws of the USA. This law should also be added, as soon as possible, in and as an amendment to the US Constitution.

No Supreme Court ruling should be subject to a US Congressional impeachment trial of the ruling itself for vacating the ruling except for if a Supreme Court ruling definitively, in whole or part, contradicts the text of the US Constitution, or contradicts factual, objective reality (such as the SCOTUS ruling that a corporation is a [human] person with the rights of persons, whereas it is not a DNA-biological human person nor even a biological organism in any scientific regard). Reputable tenured, expert professors, whether active or emeritus professors, of language, including those with expertise in linguistics and semantics, analytical and logic-based philosophy and the subject-matter applicable science or sciences should be called by the independent prosecutor, interrogator-juror constitutional-review court of state supreme court justices for constitutional text compliance enforcement and the trial jury of the full membership of the US Senate to present testimony and arguments in the impeachment trials of the prima facie-evidenced unconstitutional or unreality judicial rulings of and by SCOTUS.

For a majority of justices of the US Supreme Court to rule that citizens cannot sue or press felony prosecutable charges against US ICE officers or agents or any federal government personnel or office for violating or depriving them of their US Constitutional rights is the equivalent of nullifying their rights and overriding and overthrowing the US Constitution by artifice of judicial treason, fraudulent authority, [falsely] superior to the US Constitution and its law, that they do not genuinely have.

In Memory of the Needless and Ruthless Shooting Death of Renee Nicole Good on 01-07-2026 by a Federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency Agent, in Minneapolis, MN, a Volunteer Observer of the Compliance of Federal ICE Agents with the Law and Ethical Treatment in Conducting Their ICE Law Enforcement Work

In Memory of the Needless and Ruthless Shooting Death of Renee Nicole Good on 01-07-2026 by a Federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement Agency Agent, in Minneapolis, MN, a Volunteer Observer of the Compliance of Federal ICE Agents with the Law and Ethical Treatment in Conducting Their ICE Law Enforcement Activities

Federal Officials and Personnel of All Occupations and Levels of Service in the US Federal Government Are Subordinate and Wholly Subject to the US Constitution and US Constitutional Law (the Supreme Law and Authority of the United States of America and Which Is the Basis of Their Jobs and Offices of Service, Either Directly or Derivatively) as Well as the Legal and Law-Making Authorities It Confers to the US Congress and Its Statutory Laws that Are Compliant with the US Constitution and Substantially to Those It Confers to the States of the USA and Their Legislatures, When in or Impacting Specifically on Their Jurisdictions, to the Extent that They Do Not Conflict with the US Constitution and the Laws of the US Congress that Are Compliant with the US Constitution

— The US President by law has no law-making authority and presidential executive orders (which are presidential policy directives to Executive Branch operations and personnel for implementation as practices by them and are not laws and cannot overturn any law, whether federal, state or local) that violate US Constitutional law and Congressional and state law in-common and compliant with it are legally invalid and moot, such as any that violates a Bill-of-Rights US Constitutional right of any individual citizen or resident of the USA, including one preferencing, promoting or devaluing any religion, whether it be one or multiple of them, or by the US president with the passive condoning of the US Congressionally prevailing political party, in subterfuge of the US Constitution, designating [oppositional, competitive or objectionable, etc.] Freedom of Speech, including of thought, belief, intellect, sentiment, reading, writing or non-violent kindred religious, social, political and financial affiliations and organizing, also being the US Constitutional right to assemble, for US Constitutionally legal political or social actions or activism, which speech, on the individual or communal-group level, represents and expresses, as terrorism or un-American and subjecting it to justice system investigation, inquisition, abridgement, censorship, suppression and regulation by intimidation, harassment and punishment by US nation-state Trump MAGA-fascist incumbent top governance authority’s and such’s police agencies’ aspersion and demonization labels and labeling and unlawfully and dishonestly mis/treating it as federally criminal conduct or activity and a federal felony crime.

Neither the US Congress itself, the exclusive federal law-making authority of the USA, nor the US president can override, repeal or suspend the US Constitution and/or any of its, by-its-law, prescribed unalienable citizenry rights of its Bill of Rights, nor can they grant legal impunity or amnesty to any person, institution, or entity, etc., for his/her/its or their violation of them, for to attempt to do so would be an illegal attempt to supersede or nullify it, whether momentarily, indefinitely or permanently, which would also be immediately at the same time to nullify therewith their own US Constitutional titles, positions, legitimacy, service compensation and accommodations, and powers, altogether a US Constitutionally subversive act that the state governments would be obligated to not recognize, in protecting, defending and upholding the US Constitution, and would be entitled to prosecute in each and every of their states the so voting, acting or inaction subversive members of the US Congress as well as the president, as they, these subversives of the US Constitution, would also be violating universal individual state law subsuming, encompassing or explicitly subscribing to the US Constitution. Presidential pardons for federal crimes would not and do not apply to same state crimes covered by state laws.

US Vice President JD Vance is wrong to say that ICE agents or officers have complete, or complete blanket, legal immunity for their acts that may cause harm in the course of their performing their duties, for to say such a thing is wrongly to say that they are not subject to, but are exempt from, the laws of the US Constitution and state constitutions and the statutory laws of the US Congress and the states and within-state municipalities, and can legally brutalize and kill as well as violate the federal, state and local constitutional and statutory rights of people arbitrarily, and on any scale, without public, representational, legislative-government and court accountability, in our constitutional bill-of-rights (democratic-rights) republic form-of-government society, which is nonsense and a truly un-American, anti-US Constitution but dictatorial Nazi-fascist society leadership-governance frame-of-mind thinking and mentality.

Meidas_Charise Lee@charise_lee·Jan 9J.D. Vance has a law degree; he graduated from Yale Law School with a Juris Doctor‼️He knows better‼️

Click on the link to view her audio-video: https://x.com/i/status/2009673751332565356

By saying such a thing, with the silence or passivity of most of the mass news and news-related media, the government and civilian legal systems and MAGA-GOP majority memberships of the two houses of Congress and their non-objection to it, he would try to campaign for its acceptance. JD Vance made a similar false assertion in saying to the effect that US presidential powers and decisions are not subject to judicial system review and rulings [as to their compliance with US Constitutional and US Congressional statutory law and lawfulness] as well as that so are not those of US generals in war [albeit they are pursuant to the US military body of law the US Code of Military Justice and the international treaty law of the Geneva Conventions governing the pragmatically ethical conduct of war].

For killings, atrocities and acts of brutality committed by ICE personnel and federal military and other law-enforcement personnel against US citizens and persons within the US observing and witnessing them in their potential such activities, primarily focused on and directed against deemed or perceived to be unlawful immigrants for internment and deportation, etc., or against political or social- and ethical-values critics, viewed as enemies, of them and their such acts and the Trump-MAGA presidency and its MAGA ideology and policies directing them (these administrative bully-thug and brigand goons), VP Vance is furtively advocating and campaigning for the same complacency and largely majority acceptance of and support for the falsehood of their above-the-law legal standing, which is legally impossible, as above in-common federal Constitutional and state law ("the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness...," the rights of due process, as well as to be detained for trial by law enforcement when criminally charged, and not killed or assaulted, unless not practicable or possible during law enforcement when its officers or agents are faced with an unavoidable, actual clear, present and immediate mortal danger, and trial for a legal-system charge of criminal guilt, the prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, which includes avoidable homicide and assault by law-enforcement personnel) and legal impunity for these federal personnel for murder and mayhem against individuals of the public, historically an antecedent to gradual and commonplace mass murder and mayhem by them, but newly with US institutional and majority citizenry tolerance and acceptance of it by them. He and much of the publicly visible Trump-MAGA presidential administration show themselves to be anti-US Constitution, which is the basis of our system of government and their governance positions and powers, and against US Congressional and state law and international treaty law, except in the instances of when they support them legally.

Every person in the USA has the right, under self-appointment freelance US Constitutional right of freedom of the press, to monitor, observe, witness and report on the commission of criminal acts and the likelihood or possibility of them in public areas by public or private persons and parties, or their animals, including public officials and authorities. The USA government is the government of, for and by the people, the citizens.

For the Information of Those Outside of and Come from Outside of, and Their Associates and Ideological and Mercenary Activists of within, the United States of America Who Are Politically Crusading and Lobbying to Impose Legal Restrictions on the First Amendment Right of Freedom of Speech of the US Constitution, Forget About It -- Your Efforts Are Doomed, Absolutely So

For the Information of Those Outside of and Come from Outside of, and Their Associates and Ideological and Mercenary Activists of within, the United States of America Who Are Politically Crusading and Lobbying to Impose Legal Restrictions on the First Amendment Right of Freedom of Speech of the US Constitution, Forget About It Because There Is No Legal Path and Chance for It

The First Amendment law of the US Constitution, the national charter and supreme body of law of the Constitutional Bill-of-Rights (universal, egalitarian citizenry democratic rights) Republic of the USA prescribes that the rights specified therein of freedom of religion, speech, press, peaceful assembly and protest are unalienable and cannot be abridged (cannot be annulled, diminished or censored or censured) by law, any law, of the exclusive law-making branch of the Constitutional Republic of the USA, being the US Congress; thus, they are unalienable rights that cannot be undone or restricted even by the amendment process of the US Constitution, granted in and by the US Constitution itself, since ultimately the US Congress must vote by a supermajority in each of its two Houses to ratify an amendment to or of the US Constitution as law [which the First Amendment of the US Constitution bars and forbids the US Congress from doing to the First Amendment and the rights specified in it, being unalienable rights].

In addition, the US president has no law-making or -revoking authority, not at the federal, state, local nor international levels of government. Presidential executive orders are not laws but are policy and practice directives of the US president to federal executive branch government operations and personnel for adoption and implementation; they must be compliant with US Constitutional law, foremost, and, subordinate only to it, US Congressional federal statutory law, in order for them to be lawful and applicable.

First Amendment of the US Constitution Citation from the Library of the US Congress,

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-1/ :

"Constitution of the United States

First Amendment

'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.'"