Objection to GOP-Controlled State Legislative Manufacture of Authoritarian Governance and Anti-Personal Liberty Laws in the Needless Inspection and Social Policing of the Genitals of School Children and Teens, Legalized Voyeuristic and Sadistic Sexual Harassment Laws of Children and Teens

 

Objection to GOP-Controlled State Legislatures or both Legislatures and Governorships in Manufacture of Authoritarian Governance and Anti-Personal Liberty Laws in the Needless Inspection and Social Policing of the Genitals of School Children and Teens, Legalized Voyeuristic and Sadistic Sexual Harassment Laws of Children and Teens, Yet Doing Nothing to End and Opposing Gun Control Laws to End the Decades-Long Recalcitrant Epidemic of Rapid-fire, Powerful-Bullet and High-Bullet-Capacity Assault Gun Mass Slaughters of School Children and Teens


If there is such a dominant state legislative and governor's consensus concern for consideration and slating it to be made law, with regard to the institutional inspection and verification of the sex or genital sex of children's and minor teens' bodies, as though they are livestock or human chattel without the basic human right to respectful and dignified treatment as a human person, with adverse legal sanctions for violation of that law by not submitting to it on the part of children, parents or institutional authorities, parents via a referendum,

(Quancy@QuancyClayborne: Hey NON VOTERS THIS IS WHAT YOU NON VOTED FOR

Now adults can legally see your kids' junk (male or female). I guarantee two things are going to happen.

1 - pedophile a plenty
2 - pics of your kids' junk all over the internet

Santiago Mayer@santiagomayer: Holy fuck. Kansas Republicans just overwrote the Governor’s veto to enact a bill requiring genital inspections on student athletes. These people are sick.)

should have the first, and, the beforehand go or no-go there, voice and vote of consent to and in consideration of the legislating of that law concerning the gender genitalia inspection and classification of institutional record of their children, current, future and potential children. Such inspections in themselves are transgressive of children's sense of bodily autonomy, privacy and dignity, apart from the right of parents and authorized caretakers to exercise control over their proper and good bodily care and hygiene, sanitation and health practices, conduct and socialization.

No one should have the right to inspect the genitalia of youth or adults except by the consent of the individual (or the parent/s or specific guardian of the subject youth) or when justified for national security (NS) purposes or in the probable-cause criminal arrest of an incriminated suspect, as in a body cavity search for NS secrets, etc., contraband or stolen valuables for incriminated, arrested suspects, by a medical doctor or authorized nurse practitioner legally bound to a confidentiality oath.

If biological sexual identification must be made, it most reliably can be done by doing simple, simultaneous double-check genetic tests on them from saliva or hair-strand samples from them. Those with XX chromosome pairs or variations of this pair in the cells of their bodies are biological females whereas those with XY chromosome pairs or variations of this pair in the cells of their bodies are biological males, even if in rare instances their genitalia is/are of the opposite sex, as certain abnormal, or out-of-the-ordinary, uterine chemistry of the mother during pregnancy can redetermine or change the genetic-chromosomal predisposed sex of the fetus-infant to that of the opposite sex or to intersexual genitalia. A third category of public restrooms, locker rooms and competitive sports' games and events separately associated with the genders should be made available for the latter and within-female and -male biological sex-type variants, such as genetic-chromosomal XXx and XYy types, as well as transgender identity children and adolescents of minor age, at their and their parents'/'s choosing.

Individuals with congenital genitalia that does/do not correspond to their genetic-chromosomal sex or gender, which is their fundamental [biological] sex or gender, are nevertheless socio-biologically, congenitally-exogenously the sex type or gender of their genitalia and should socially be grouped with the gender people of their genitalia in situations where separation of the biological sexes or genders is socially advisable and practiced. However, since genetic-chromosomal XY, and variants of this, males and those who are physically fit individuals with female genitalia would tend (on average) to have a muscle mass, speed and power advantage over biologically fundamental [physically fit] genetic-chromosomal female-females (although genetic-chromosomal, or fundamental biological, females tend largely to have a substantial muscle and general body flexibility advantage over males), therefore congenitally genital females who are cellularly genetic-chromosomal male should compete in a third category of swimming, boxing and track-and-field muscle-power sports from biologically normal females and males -- but congenital males who are cellularly genetic-chromosomal XX, and variants of this, females with male genitalia should be free to participate in the third category of gender sports or that of males.

The Bill of Rights for Parents legislation proffered by GOP Congress members that does not protect the right to life and freedom from harm or threat typically from mass-assault firearms at schools of school children and teens is an insincere PR and politricks gimmick, sideshow and scam. https://twitter.com/nytimes/status/1641831493927333890 …