MAGA-GOP Members of the US Congressional House of Representatives Publicly Are Threatening Federal District Court Abolishment and Impeachment of Federal Judges with Judicial Rulings on Matters of US Constitutional and Standing Federal Congressional Statutory Law that Go Against President Donald Trump's Will and Administrative or Political Agenda

MAGA-GOP Members of the US Congressional House of Representatives Publicly Are Threatening Federal District Court Abolishment and Impeachment of Federal Judges with Judicial Rulings on Matters of US Constitutional and Standing Federal Congressional Statutory Law that Go Against President Donald Trump's Will and Administrative or Political Agenda -- Chapter 2 of the 01-06-2021 GOP Congressional Membership to Internally, via Illegal Legislative Procedure, within the Legislative Branch of the Federal Government, Attempt to Subvert and Overthrow the USA Constitutional Democratic Bill of Rights Republic and Replace it with a Trump Cult-MAGA Oligarchy or Dictatorship

(Mouse click on the hyperlink at the end of the following narrative to view the news report video.)

The US House of Representatives GOP membership, which has a slight membership majority in the House of Representatives, has members, including the speaker of the House, Congressman Michael Johnson, of Louisiana, who now want to use the funding allocation authority of the bicameral US Congress to intimidate the federal judges of the US judiciary to make biased as opposed to fair and honest judicial rulings on matters of the legality of acts in reference to federal law and their compliance or noncompliance and violation or adherence to US Constitutional law and bicameral US Congressional legislated statutory law, the highest bodies of law in the USA with US Constitutional law supreme and bicameral US Congressional statutory law the penultimate body of law and subordinate only to the US Constitution. They openly declare they want to use the funding, legislative and impeachment powers of the bicameral US Congress to influence the judges of the federal judiciary to render judicial rulings involving federal court hearings involving the US president that are in favor of the US president and that support his will as US president and his presidential, that is, political agenda, regardless of what is the stated US Constitutional and existing US Congressional law [not in conflict with supreme US Constitutional law]. As a practical matter rather than a legally technical one, they would not be able to remove a federal judge by impeachment because it takes, successively, both chambers of the US Congress to impeach, with a conviction by impeachment trial finally in the US Senate, and remove a federal judge for performing his or her duties without proving in the US Senate impeach hearing trial actual judicial corruption (such as involving illicit money or financial value or otherwise trading of judicial rulings, rendering them as personal favors, treason, criminal sex and other crimes of established government criminal or ethics codes), a conviction that would require a majority vote of 67 US senators for it of the 100 senators of the US Senate, in which there are 53 Republican senators and 46 Democratic Party senators and 1 independent-socialist senator of the US Senate, of which none of the Democratic Party senators nor the 1 independent-socialist senator would vote for conviction but who would vote against conviction of any federal judge. Congressional legislation initiated in the US House of Representatives to defund or abolish particular or all federal district courts in the highest probability would fail legislative passage in the US Senate, if not in the US House of Representatives first, as any such defunding or abolishment would result in the unleashing of a torrential downpour and deluge of federal criminal and civil illegality, including against commerce and federal institutions, personnel, currency and property with virtual impunity, indefinity. It also may be federally criminally culpable, as well as even a civilly illegally culpable, congressional legislation whose, and when its, objective, in violation of the US Constitution's separation of powers of the 3 co-equal legislative, executive and judicial branches of the federal government, is to control and prejudice, and thereby corrupt, the judicial independence and decisions on matters of law of the judges of the federal judiciary by politically motivated and biased legislative as well as impeachment proceedings against federal judges judicially independent of them and their political partisanship.

Remember, care and cherish that our form of government is [that of] a US Constitutional Bill of Rights Republic, including of the three separate-powers co-equal branch of the federal government, regardless of who the changeable and changing US president is, who likewise makes up the membership of the houses of the bicameral US Congress, who likewise are the judges, or justices, of the federal judiciary and what likewise the will of the shifting majority or plurality of the electorate is. Its supreme law and our US Constitutional egalitarian legal rights as persons and individuals and the US Constitutionally fundamental governmental branches and institutions within them stand unbridgeably and irrevocably by them, nevertheless.

https://www.facebook.com/reel/614317758271636

Short-Trader and Vulture-Capitalist Bottom-Feeder Yo-Yo, Upswing-and-Downswing, Playing [of] the Stock Market and Economy via Seeming Capriciously Shifting, Shifty Presidential Tariff Policy Announcements

04-10-2025

Short-Trader and Vulture-Capitalist Bottom-Feeder Yo-Yo, Upswing-and-Downswing, Playing [of] the Stock Market and Economy via Seeming Capriciously Shifting, Shifty Presidential Tariff Policy Announcements

It definitively appears that Trump and his flock of insatiably gluttonous vulture capitalist billionaires, and mega-millionaires too, are short-trader and recession-bottom-feeder yo-yo playing [of] the stock market and economy to their selfish predatory benefit. By Trump reportedly commenting to this effect on his social media platform Truth/er Social and that these yo-yo [stock-market and economy] downswings are buy-low and sell-high and bargain asset purchase [investment] opportunities, which they are, that can supercharge and skyrocket your wealth, he is also attracting and enlarging membership respectively to and on his online Truth Social social media platform of those traders, investors and financial speculators as well as asset defenders, market observers/watchers, financial analysts and economics scholars, etc., who want heads-up tips or hints, directly from POTUS Trump, on indicated coming downswings and upswings, resultant from his publicly considered or stated economic policies, in the stock market and economy or for even foreign economies and corresponding changes in major companies' market valuations and stock values. He thereby also boosts the notoriety and popularity, positively for a considerable some and negatively for considerably others, of his online Truth/er Social social media platform.

What POTUS Trump's Tariffs Really Do in His MAGA, America-First Land and to the Large Majority of the People of the USA

What POTUS Trump's Tariffs Really Do in His MAGA, America-First Land and to the Large Majority of the People of the USA

04-03-2025 -- Reiterating more expansively

What the Trump right hand takes away in taxes, with 83% of this federal tax cut benefitting the billionaires and mega-millionaires, his sweeping-and-high-tariffs magician left hand more than offsets and raises in retail consumer-purchase taxes, the equivalent of a disguised federal sales tax, under the label of tariffs, that is in addition to state and local government sales taxes, predominately paid by the middle- and low-income classes and substantially and meaningfully reducing their purchasing and overall financial power.

Such tariffs on imported foreign goods and input products used in the manufacture or production of domestic goods relax the competitive pressure on domestic producers and wholesalers to produce and supply the retail and mass household consumer marketplace with goods at best competitive prices and tempt and incentivize them to uncompetitively raise prices per se, which import goods retailers and inputs user domestic producers in part must do nevertheless to preserve their profit margins or profitability and solvency. They also incentivize the revving up or emergence of black-market underground economies to sell, or selling, at much lower prices smuggled, heisted and counterfeit goods, including, but more than, electronics, appliances, auto parts, jewelry, apparel, dried and canned foods, alcoholic beverages and tobacco smoking items, at much lower and affordable prices, which are consequently tariff and entirely tax evasive and free.

Extensive and high tariffs like those of POTUS Trump imposed on so many nations will promptly provoke compensatorily retaliatory, reciprocal tariffs on USA export businesses and good from the central government authorities that have taxing power and the control of the affairs in international commerce of those nations targeted and hit by the questionably legal tariffs of 1930s-and-1940s-fascist-era ideological minded MAGA US President Trump. They will do this for the purpose of supporting and protecting the international-trade economic interests of their national business community, which result in a loss of market welcome, competitiveness, share and profitability of US business and goods in those nations.

Potentially, these tariffs levied on foreign imports into the USA are not legal because the US Constitution, which is the supreme law of the USA, confer all fiscal, including tariff-levying and commerce regulation, authority of the USA to the US Congress and although the US Congress has delegated some of its tariff levying, etc., authority to the US President by statutory-law legislated Acts of Congress, its such legislation very well might not be US Constitutional and thus Constitutionally illegal, as may be its delegation to the US President its, in part, US Constitutionally conferred war powers authority.

Tariffs levied on imports to the USA by the US President and presidential executive order may in earnest be US Constitutionally illegal because the US Congress and the laws legislated by the US Congress respectively are subordinate to the US Constitution and laws of the US Constitution, and the US Congress cannot on its own, through only its own legislation, change the US Constitution and its laws, which is to say as regards these issues that the Congress, as a matter of US Constitutional law, cannot legally overrule or bypass the US Constitution in any way, or nullify, abandon, alienate or share the powers, in whole or the least part, conferred to it by the US Constitution, except to only US Constitutionally properly modify, as US Constitutionally prescribed, the US Constitution and its laws, limited to those that are not the unalienable rights that it irrevocably decrees, by the legislative passage of initiatives to amend the US Constitution, being amendments to the US Constitution, by successively two-thirds of each the House of Representatives and Senate of the US Congress and three-fourths of the state legislatures.

Click on the link below to access the article of the US Constitution conferring the power to levy tariffs to the US Congress (and not the US President):

https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/article-1/section-8/